Quantcast
Channel: #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc
Viewing all 12928 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Re: Lines, Pos of Lines

May 29, 2019, 3:37 pm
$
0
0
So take your example came DS 42, this is a stream of roulette. The next stage, we follow the rrbb recipe and create positions.
Look
4 412356 4
2 241356 3
So it works, how to apply?
We will hope that the blueprint will give us a little understanding so that we can move on.
I think the main goal, to collect this puzzle. Here you need to be very attentive.
Perhaps all this is a big joke, and it is not known what we will come to ...
They do not give an exact recipe, and I understand them, they are probably kidding, and this is also understandable. But the main goal is discipline.
↧
Search

Re: True/Fair Randomness

May 30, 2019, 2:20 pm
$
0
0
Quote from: Steve on Today at 04:27 PM
My specific approaches are not the only that work. But as far as i know, only physics-based methods work because only they consider cause and effect.

The B&Ms i visit, no one stands over the wheel watching it.   So it seems anyone watching a wheel would stand out, especially if watching it carefully.  I mean, isn't that a giveaway? Plus late bets?  I mean, it's about as obvious as someone who sets dice and throws them the same way each time.  They ignore it because the B&M doesn't believe it is possible, or they know there is a small subset of people who can influence dice, among a large subset of those who think they can.  So, if you set dice and start taking too much money out, they can just say no thanks, no more play.  Probably same with VB players who are actually using eye-balls to estimate the fall zones.   So a computer user can mask behind the persona of a straight VB player, i guess, till one starts to take out too much money.  Then they might assume there is a computer involved.  But for sure, the first thing they think is probably, does this VB player use his eyes, or a computer?
↧
↧

Re: True/Fair Randomness

May 30, 2019, 2:31 pm
$
0
0
Its really not that hard to avoid detection, unless youre winning millions. Everyone looks at the wheel. Many players bet late. Thats why casinos allow it. A magician does things in plain sight and novody notices. Do you think its so hard to be careful about yoyr behavior at a table?
↧

Re: Done with systems.

May 30, 2019, 3:51 pm
$
0
0
It should be noted that Laurance Scott played VB using cross over patterns which develop easier with 2-3 second rotor so it shows there are really very many different approaches. He also had a sound method of playing traditional knee point  VB. But hr was playing on higher profile frets and 2-3 second rotor with low profile frets lead to big scatters which can be difficult to predict. Also the faster the rotor, the better you have to be due to reading and parallax error at speed.

Playing VB online is very limited because casinos are aware of computer users which is a more accurate form of VB. They therefore call no more bets very early or even before the spin. They also disrupt your view of the wheel during the betting period.
↧

Re: Done with systems.

May 30, 2019, 4:02 pm
$
0
0
There isnt a method or approach that works for ALL wheels and conditions. You need to apply the correct approach for the specific wheel and conditions.

It isnt ideal, but not much in life is. Going to work every day is not ideal either.
↧
↧

Re: True/Fair Randomness

May 30, 2019, 4:08 pm
$
0
0
I am a magician, Its alll about misdirection folks :thumbsup:
↧

Re: Lines, Pos of Lines

May 31, 2019, 1:25 pm
$
0
0
Recently, I have a light alcohol dependence.
Can I clarify a bit - does a dependency create only one thread?
↧

Re: Tomla

May 31, 2019, 3:20 pm
$
0
0
We spoke often

Good guy

Loved roulette and he seemed to always be lucky lol

If there is an afterlife I Hope he’s found winning tables
↧
Search

Re: Tomla

May 31, 2019, 3:53 pm
$
0
0
If there's an after life I hope they have no money...
↧
↧

Re: Lines, Pos of Lines

May 31, 2019, 4:08 pm
$
0
0
You can tell when you’re doing something right.  Also when you’re doing something that is leading to new information and it feels like you’re getting closer to understanding it.

No need to keep posting in the forum about it. 

Especially when someone is just posting trying to get information out of you cause they can’t figure it out themselves
↧

Re: Lines, Pos of Lines

May 31, 2019, 4:10 pm
$
0
0
So you figured out where there is dependence!!!

SO WHAT?!!

What’s the play?  Don’t post it here!  Go and work it out!
↧

Re: Lines, Pos of Lines

June 1, 2019, 12:17 pm
$
0
0
The problem here is that tracker redhot it’s showing the normal position of ds  and the position it was in when it was hit...it’s not showing it’s true position as it’s moving I want you to think about that..
↧

Re: Lines, Pos of Lines

June 1, 2019, 12:44 pm
$
0
0
Quote from: Person S on Today at 07:03 AM
Wow you have an ego Money, rewind time ago, you were just as curious and those people did not deny you answers. And then you try to shut everyone up.

Speak from experience not from ignorance

My understanding came from working on things on my own with all the information you have on this forum!
↧
↧

Re: Lines, Pos of Lines

June 1, 2019, 12:46 pm
$
0
0
Quote from: Blueprint on Yesterday at 08:40 PM
And now we are back to the MoneyT show.  He can take it from here with his nonsense riddles.

No riddles.. I have nothing else to share with anyone.

Last few post of mine I shared FACTS

Do with that info what you please....
↧

Re: ANTI STREET REPEATER (DOZEN VERSION)

June 1, 2019, 1:24 pm
$
0
0
Just for you my friend...Duisburg wheels, sequential order.

Never went over 155 in the progression.
↧
Search

Re: Lines, Pos of Lines

June 1, 2019, 2:30 pm
$
0
0
At least you admit you have helped no one but yourself.   :thumbsup:
↧

Re: The 'repeat window' - Math vs Reality

June 2, 2019, 5:11 am
$
0
0
Redhot, could you share your opinion about the last post please?
It's seem very interesting.
Thanks!!!
↧
↧

Re: The 'repeat window' - Math vs Reality

June 2, 2019, 6:11 am
$
0
0
Quote from: quos on Today at 08:11 AM
Redhot, could you share your opinion about the last post please?
It's seem very interesting.
Thanks!!!

Your method looks interesting have you tested it? How does it play out?

I don't have the answer, I'm not here to say what's right or wrong. I'm simply sharing my thoughts to hopefully inspire other ideas.
↧

Re: The 'repeat window' - Math vs Reality

June 2, 2019, 6:49 am
$
0
0
Quote from: redhot on May 09, 10:19 AM 2019
Mathematically, roulette can't be beaten. This is a fact.

However, this is under the assumption that roulette will behave in a mathematically expected way defined by probability. If it doesn't, the above statement no longer holds true.

If we could find a situation where roulette results do not conform to the mathematical expectation, we may have a chance to beat the game.

A simple example is a biased wheel, certain numbers/sectors hit above the mathematical expectation. Betting on these numbers gives an advantage.

What an interesting proposition? Incorrect but interesting all the same. You are clearly mistaken about the math.
↧

Re: Guaranteed hits. . .

June 2, 2019, 9:03 am
$
0
0
Quote from: mickavelli on Yesterday at 09:10 PM
What game are you playing here mate?
We have 4 possible outcomes of RR-RB-BB-BR.
I'm looking for an opportunity to repeat, if you take the grid, it will look like this:
RB - if 9 spin comes out R, then on spin 13 we can play for the combination of RB. The rest is identical ...
RR
RR
RB
↧
Viewing all 12928 articles
Browse latest View live
Search